Matt Rogerson

My feedback

  1. 657 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    87 comments  ·  Customer Wishlist » Detail view and warehouse  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Rogerson commented  · 

    @drew - yep if you want to keep track of assets I guess you could just scan into two browser windows? Then global check back in - that's lots of clicks though ... You could asset scan onto the 1st job then group load the matching quantity for the following jobs - but then you would have to go back through to match up the returns ...
    Elegant solution would be good though ... I'm not sure we have given a definitive "it should do this" for the programmers - hopefully they are working with other users to develop it ...

    Matt Rogerson commented  · 

    @drew - could you mark the items that are transferring from another job as booked out and set their "container" to the job they are transferring from ?
    That would stop them being picked and have a note on the system showing where it's coming from. Could do it when the 1st job loads so the quantities match - take advantage of Current RMS only booking kit out fir the job timeframe regardless of the scan / bookout real time ...

    Matt Rogerson commented  · 

    Just to add - when I said "they have outlined how this will work" - they didn't share that with me - its an internal document ....

    Matt Rogerson commented  · 

    Speaking to the team a PLASA they have outlined how this is going to work but I don't think started to work on it yet ..? It sounds like progress but I was really surprised this has taken so long and that there are other projects being worked on before this gets sorted - I understand that the pricing and purchasing modules need work - but day to day this seems to be causing more people more of an issue. It would be great if they shared what they are planning to do - its never going to meet everyone needs but at least if they said what they were planning we might end up with a solution that works for most of us - rather than what they *think* will work for us ?

    Matt Rogerson supported this idea  · 
  2. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Customer Wishlist » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve added SSO with Google and Microsoft to Current RMS, allowing you to consolidate your security and identity management.

    With SSO, your company’s system administrator can manage your Google or Microsoft account and set security policies for it, such as enabling two factor authentication and password expiry.

    We’re looking into adding two factor authentication for Current RMS logins, too.

    For more information, see: Sign in to Current RMS using Google or Microsoft

    Matt Rogerson supported this idea  · 
  3. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Customer Wishlist » Detail view and warehouse  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Rogerson shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base